Regardless of the outcome of the process against Harvey Weinstein is historic, because never before had such a public impact, has been demonstrated, what is the main problem when it comes to dealing with sexualized Assault: the question of who has the responsibility in such cases. The answer is still, unfortunately, largely a matter of interpretation and, as a consequence of individual decisions.

This is the reason why since the beginning of the process to qualities of character and manners, based on a prejudice that is maintained by many people, and to the office of the public Prosecutor as to the defense: namely, that it is a character question, whether a man and a woman in a corresponding Situation.

wine stone's lawyer, Donna Rotunno has pushed this strategy to the extreme. An actress she was attributing to the representation of talent. Another asked for an E-Mail read, in the Tartar genitals – apparently, in order to show that this woman was indiscreet enough to broach the issue of a scrotum. Woman to woman, it should be established a kind of collective character, the overachieving, untrustworthy, and fickle. The kind of woman that makes an important man in your apartment, in order to feel important.

responsibility is to the women slipped

of Course Harvey Weinstein is, after all, what you know, an exception culprit – but only in terms of the extent. The frequency with which women without cream of Tartar-contact around the world – whether shy or outgoing, young or old, sexy or sack-like dressed – Assault experience, suggests that character issues play a subordinate role.

For the process, and its effect is crucial to the question of who bears how much responsibility, if übergriffige situations between equal adults emerge. When exactly will Equal from two to some extent a too much, and one that is taken from the? It is the core of all cultural and legal battles on this topic. Donna Rotunno said in an Interview two weeks ago that it was, in their opinion, stupid or vain decisions of the women who brought you into distress. She is certainly not the Only one who thinks so.

of Course Harvey Weinstein, after all, what you know is an exceptional offender, but only what relates to the extent.

but Where is the one who makes the supposedly silly or vain decision to take advantage of this bill? What makes him different from men who do not act in this way? The #MeToo-movement must always be accused of, you would like to speak to women of any effectiveness in gender relations free. Critics like to emphasize that sexualized situations, "two", so women are to blame. They fail to see that the burden of responsibility for everything heterosexual is traditionally always pushed alone to the female sex.

A free woman is, of course, self-responsible, with whom she goes to eat, what she wears and whether she's flirting. What is the free other concludes, and how he deals with a possible error, but falls clearly within its responsibility. And what is between them: to clarify Also, the project of the #MeToo movement, and it is the task of all.

Created: 18.02.2020, 18:14 PM