Shortly before the expulsion he became the father of a child

He has condemned an impressive rap sheet: 16 Times was the Kosovars already, his longest sentence was 15 months. He had made the abduction of guilty, of attempt

Shortly before the expulsion he became the father of a child

He has condemned an impressive rap sheet: 16 Times was the Kosovars already, his longest sentence was 15 months. He had made the abduction of guilty, of attempted coercion, and more than once gross traffic rule violation.

Now he has to leave Switzerland despite a wife and four month old son, both Swiss citizens. The decision of the Zurich administrative court. The man knew that the eviction was threatened, when he started a family, say the judges.

He had already

go back in June 2008, the migration office of Canton Aargau had withdrawn from the Kosovars, the residence permit, in October 2008, but the man got married to a Swiss woman. Nevertheless, all of the instances rejected the appeals against the expulsion.

in 2013, was imposed an entry ban against him, but in 2016, the man was allowed to return to Switzerland. The Zurich migration office issued him a residence permit "to remain in the wife".

a Few months later was divorced, the marriage, what the immigration office, the man withdrew in December 2016, the residence permit again. Only nine days after the decision of the Kosovars challenged – he married again to a Swiss woman.

Then his wife was pregnant

Also, the re-eviction, challenged the man through all the instances of. During the process of delivery, was his wife pregnant. In October 2019, a son was born, a month later, the Federal court upheld the removal order.

The man awaken "the total image of a socially well integrated, habitual delinquents", was the highest court. Even after his re-entry he had become re-offenders, for gross traffic rule violations, he had collected two fines of a total of 330 days.

He argues with father-child relationship

The man filed a reconsideration request. He'll be expelled, so the endangering the Welfare of his son, "both in terms of the father-child relationship, as well as in financial terms". However, this Argument did not apply to the administrative court, as before the migration office and the security Directorate. The interest in a family life is a public interest in a removal order to the contrary, there is a "on its own, better knowledge-based behaviour change" is not to be expected.

The woman is expected to look for work, the court finds. And contacts between the father and the son are also possible if the father is living in Kosovo. Add to this that the couple knew the Situation of the man, as it had decided to start a family: "he begat still a kid, he was aware that he would be separated from this life."

Only in one point, the administrative court revised the security Directorate. This had accused the man lack of responsibility, recklessness, and abuse of the law. The go to far, took place in the administrative court.

Created: 03.03.2020, 08:09 PM

Updated Date: 03 March 2020, 08:02

Tagesanzeiger

Tagesanzeiger


Contact Details

You need to login to comment.

Please register or login.

RELATED NEWS