Faes, the foundation's former president José María Aznar, has spread this Tuesday a note that accuses Pedro Sanchez having been an Executive with “those who want to make Spain a failed State” —is the consideration that they have, for example, countries such as Somalia— . The text criticizes all the support of the PSOE in the endowment, which divided into “those who justify terrorism etarra”, “el golpismo-independence” and “the forces provincialistas that by joining PNV, Bildu, ERC give a new meaning to the expression the Spain emptied”. In addition, it calls on the PP which does not confuse the opposition “offers hoaxed” of the Executive with the covenants of State.
The foundation of Aznar defined Sanchez as “the lie personified”: he “Believes that politics is an exercise in bold manipulation,” reads the note. On the composition of the new Executive of the coalition regrets that are going to use “the prestige of some of its members” as “an alibi to pretend moderation,” and criticizes the “pathological normalcy with which the PSOE, and a good part of public opinion has assumed that the Spanish Government will negotiate with the leader of the golpismo”.
In its press release, FAES denounces the “undesirable token concession to the language” with the appeal of Sanchez to “desjudicializar” the challenge separatist, which, according to the former president, “cannot be interpreted as an advancement of the culture of impunity that awaits the guilty.” Aznar also made concessions to the language at that stage in The Moncloa, for example, when it referred to ETA as the “national liberation movement of the basque” to authorize contacts with the band and try to leave the weapons.It also ensures the former Government that you can't believe Sanchez when he says that there will not be a self-determination referendum in Catalonia.
The foundation of Aznar concluded his statement by recommending to the PP to organize a “resistance” despite “being labelled opposition crispadora”. If well, recommended to to the popular that are not in accordance “with the rejection,” and to build “a proposal of social and political, fresh and attractive.”Updated Date: 14 January 2020, 21:00