If you just have an extra 180 million dollars lying on the bottom of the coffers every year, you can of course give them away.
How to behave the Parliament itself, when the so-called seniorpræmie with loose hand sprinkled out over the higher middle class.
the Idea is to get people to work a few extra years beyond retirement age, but this method is extremely costly. We stand in front of the many challenges with a new pension system, especially how we better take care of the run-down. But the new law 'solves problems', which does not exist for the people, availing themselves of the.
It surprises me very much that SF is the only party that does not support the law. 'Well, it will not do in addition to someone to reward pensioners with the carrots,' reads one of the arguments. Nothing comes of nothing, so yes, it actually goes beyond any. The money flowing from the common earners to the well-off and resourceful retirees.
It is not the run-down, which climbs up to the pensionsmålstregen that can reap premiums by working a few extra years. They stand outside with næserne pressed flat against the pane and looking into the privilegeredes taxpayer-funded party. The law means redistribution, which makes the society more unequal. We should go the opposite way and create more fairness.
the Assertion is that retirees will work more, but it is f-sharp in a hornlygte. The ministry of employment calculates that the 5.600 people get the prize in 2020, and tells at the same time that the 5000 would be continued anyway. The 600 extra on the job is good enough, expensive in operation. All of these strong pensioners do get fat sometimes, and afterwards, send the maybe a thank you note to the politicians who sent the rare money in their direction?
of course It is super fine, if people want to be some extra years in the job. It makes the strong and Betboo healthy physically and mentally profits already today. In the future they can do it, as they would have done, but now with 67,000 lovely tax-free dollars in your back pocket, if you take two extra years.
With a single year string of 42,000 dollars down in the lining. I asked a number of questions to the minister, and it was on the way proven, that the cash prizes are, in particular, to the high-paying with long education.
the Parliamentary majority has apparently enough money for fresh, bodied and strong pensioners, but when it is Arnes trip? This wastefulness put some things in place. The money is there, the question is only, who will have the benefit of them. I propose to support the poorest, bl.a. with better home-help services. And we must roll up our sleeves to build a pensionsmodel, which gives the opportunity to all get some good worthy year as seniors.
Nearly 20 percent of the former LO members expect not even to be able to work until retirement age. Among people with medium levels of education is at 7.6 percent, and for graduates is only 4.3 percent, which is not expected to clear the hike back to the time of his retirement.
Every fifth member of the 3F is already out of the labour market, when they reached the age of 60 years, either because they are on a disability pension, without income or dead.
instead of more money to those who already are well off, I would rather solve real problems. It is using to the run-down and earlier retirement to people who started on the job as a very young.
The higher middle class welcomes the good reason for christmas. There is a tax-free prizes under the tree from the leader, who is playing santas.Karsten Hønge Member of the Danish Parliament, SF
the MF is from 2007 – 11, as a temp in 2014 and 2015. Former local politician arranged and fagforeningsformand. Trained tømrersvend and has traveled around the world several times. There must be a difference in the left and right. The hot water should be hot, and the cold cold. Shoots with sharp – someone has to say it. Policy should not be unnecessarily boring. You can't be friends with everyone. Can't keep ømskindede and self-important politicians.Date Of Update: 25 November 2019, 17:00