In recent weeks there has been a lot of talk about ass, in fine language behind, which is the same tits and tits, and now it has caught us for the first time. We live the breast festival, although not so much because it did not come to Eurovision, and for me that's why they have it, some and if we are guided by the networks, so much mania behind Chanel. That if she is hypersexualized - for 25 euros the answer, names of musical idols who are not. That if the singer's dress is not for such a contest - for 25 euros the answer, names of festivals in which sexual glam is absent. What if the lyrics of the song are rude and sexist - for 25 euros the answer, names of lyrical poets who have triumphed in life.
As if traditional masculinity and its headline headlines were not enough, or the paramasclism it uses to indirectly attack feminism for its victory at the Fest, it must also be seen in the feminism clad in feminism of those who decree the which is progressive - the breast - and which is heteropatriarchy - the ass. Chanel has the right to teach whatever it wants because that's what it is for, and that's what we've called "freedom," because if it's just to replace dictation, we're not doing well. Reducing a singer’s triumph to her movements comes as if Elvis hadn’t boomed with her hips or Tom Jones didn’t owe her a Grammy to her chest fluff. And let me tell you - I love both of them.
4