The left-profile wonder about the royal family-the opinion: 'It is quite dangerous, it Vermund has the time in the'

"It's pretty dangerous, it Vermund time." so says the Liberal party member of parliament Jan E. Jørgensen on the New Borgerliges leader, Pernille Vermund,

The left-profile wonder about the royal family-the opinion: 'It is quite dangerous, it Vermund has the time in the'

"It's pretty dangerous, it Vermund time."

so says the Liberal party member of parliament Jan E. Jørgensen on the New Borgerliges leader, Pernille Vermund, and the statements she has come up with about the Danish royal family.

In a longer interview with Berlingske on Monday declared Vermund agreed with the contributor Eva Agnete Selsing in, to the Danish crown prince couple of denmark for the time being is too politicised.

the Latest example came according to the politician and the contributor, as crown princess Mary and crown prince Frederik recently gave out their annual awards.

Here was the organization Bydelsmødrene and the social enterprise FRAK honored.

the Former works to create social network for minority women, while the latter organization helps young people in disadvantaged residential areas in Copenhagen and to get part-time jobs.

Also the musician Jada won one of the Danish crown prince prices, and in her acceptance speech, she used her time to desire that white supremacy and patriarchy go, where peppery grow.

"it Had now only been about Jada, one could say that it was just a maria situation. But there is indeed a conscious choice in the price to Bydelsmødrene. There is a conscious choice in the price paid to the company (FRAK, ed.), which get young people into work," says Pernille Vermund to the media and elaborates:

"And there is a conscious choice to participate in climate change events. And the conscious choice is more political than it is, I think, you have taken earlier. And I will still think that it is a bad way to go."

But Jan E. Jørgensen could not disagree more.

in Fact, he thinks that He Vermunds errand is downright dangerous.

"You have to be careful not to criticize the royal family, who must represent everyone - including people who do not support them. So would the royal family could never show himself publicly to the events of, for example, LGBT, arts and culture. So it would be a matter and teeth royal family," says Jan E. Jørgensen.

"it is dangerous, It Vermund time," he says.

Why is it dangerous?

"It threatens to undermine popular support for the royal family, which must embrace a broad - also the people, as the New Civil did not agree with."

But Pernille Vermund not a point in that royal family members should take care to mix in politics?

"It is true that they do not have to tell who they vote for, or come up with concrete proposals for reductions in emissions of greenhouse gases, but they may like to put a general focus on nature conservation through the WWF, as prince Henrik did for many years, or on the climate, which is an important topic in these years."

Why do you think, Pernille Vermund, comes with the here opinions now?

"It is quite clear, because the crown prince and crown princess have paid tribute to some artists, as the New Civil did not agree with. But the royal couple celebrates the artists ' work, not their political positions. For me to see is the lack of inclusiveness towards people who are different thinking," says Jan E. Jørgensen explains:

"You are obviously only the royal, when it fits into your agenda - and so is not really royal."

Updated Date: 27 November 2019, 00:00

You need to login to comment.

Please register or login.

RELATED NEWS